Archived
This forum has been archived. Please start a new discussion on GitHub.
Class/Interface Confusion with IcePack
I'm digging around with IcePack since I have some free time on my hands and I have a question.
My original SLICE implementation for my code is like this:
My server and client actually works. But now I'm thinking of implementing it as a Windows service. The ICE documentation points to IcePack, unfortunately I'm getting overwhelmed (confused) with the official documentation so I went and look at the demo\IcePack\simple source codes.
What surprised me is that the SLICE definition actually goes like this:
Earlier samples, particularly the first one, uses the interface keyword but this one is different. I tried re-reading the SLICE documentation but I'm still at a loss on how to convert my exisiting interface definition to class definition.
I will of course continue with playing around with my code. I just hope someone can point me in the right direction before I waste a huge amount of time.
Thanks for any help.
r/Alex
edit: fixed spelling errors
My original SLICE implementation for my code is like this:
#ifndef JSOCKETS_ICE #define JSOCKETS_ICE sequence<byte> ByteSeq; interface jSockets { ByteSeq execute(ByteSeq command); }; #endif
My server and client actually works. But now I'm thinking of implementing it as a Windows service. The ICE documentation points to IcePack, unfortunately I'm getting overwhelmed (confused) with the official documentation so I went and look at the demo\IcePack\simple source codes.
What surprised me is that the SLICE definition actually goes like this:
#ifndef HELLO_ICE #define HELLO_ICE class Hello { nonmutating void sayHello(); idempotent void shutdown(); }; #endif
Earlier samples, particularly the first one, uses the interface keyword but this one is different. I tried re-reading the SLICE documentation but I'm still at a loss on how to convert my exisiting interface definition to class definition.
I will of course continue with playing around with my code. I just hope someone can point me in the right direction before I waste a huge amount of time.
Thanks for any help.
r/Alex
edit: fixed spelling errors
0
Comments
-
You don't really need to convert your interfaces to classes. In this particular case, where there are no data members, an interface is much more appropriate anyway.
Have a look at chatper 4.9.8 "Architectural Implications of Classes" for more information on classes.
In any case, whether you are using classes or interfaces doesn't matter for IcePack.0 -
Thanks for the link to the chapter 4.9.8 ... it actually help me understand SLICE more.
Still, I think I'm asking the wrong question. I'll just post another thread.
Thanks again.
r/Alex0